Member-to-Member

Who Says You Must Blog to Protect Your Good Name? A Case Study

In recent weeks, I've noticed a new theme amongst the social media digerati that goes something like "how do we get the rest of the world to understand the promise of social media? How do we get all those laggard companies blogging and tweeting with us?" I've always cautioned my clients not to jump too far ahead of their customers and stakeholders in adopting any technology, and though I do believe that all companies should factor social media into their outreach and marketing strategies, it is far from appropriate for every company in every situation to use social media as a primary tool. Here's an example of where caution is warranted: the situation facing CACI in their response to allegations that their employees were involved in the Abu Ghraib torture scandals in 2004.

Last week I attended an Executive Biz book signing for the book Our Good Name which documents CACI's response to what Chairman of CACI's Board, Jack London, insists are false accusations against the defense contractor. The book is voluminous and detailed and London's defense at the event was impassioned.Shashi Bellamkonda from Network Solutions was there also and blogged about it. Check out his video from the event (note: I took the picture of him with Dr. London).

Explaining the situation in 2004 when the story first broke, Dr. London portrayed the company as on the defense against a media juggernaut that forced them into a public relations response strategy he characterizes in the book as "Whack-a-Mole". Four years after the fact, despite the book and the company's PR defense strategy to prove its innocence, legal and media allegations persist.

At the book signing several of us asked Dr. London about the company's decision in '04-'05 to pursue a traditional PR strategy of defending the company, specifically their decision not to blog about it or confront bloggers in public fora, opting for private communications which attempted to set the record straight. Dr. London's response was insightful. In essence he said that the company chose not to engage in public (including social media) dialog because it did not want to legitimize bloggers and journalists who it perceived were jumping on the attention-getting bandwagon of a hot story based on incorrect information.

(Un)usability: The Social Web's Dirty Little Secret

I promised myself I wouldn't rant, but I will admit to being frustrated. I finally have to admit that "this social networking stuff" is not so easy to use.

While I try to justify and design social networks for myself and clients, I find myself explaining almost daily the advantages of blogging and SNing to my friends and associates. And as I explain it to them I'm forced to confront the fact that lost between nonstandard functionality and the sheer newness of concepts like 'tweets' and 'trackbacks' lies the still unrealized promise of the social web. I'm not the only one, even Charlene and Josh have noticed it.

Why do I call these ancient (in web years) concepts new? Because in my general social media evangelism, client work and social network building I am committed to finding ways to bring the rest of the population into productive uses of this technology, uses that facilitate their day jobs instead of eating up their sleep time. In my very unscientific analysis, this means the 83% of the "mostly mature" population with whom the social web has yet to entrench itself. And to these people, who I think of as the "Unsocialized Web," tweets, trackbacks, friends lists, tags, RSS readers and ganks really are new.

In calling out the Unsocialized Web population I'm referring to the 35+ year olds who currently run the majority of our society. Though unscientific, my identification of this market segment is based on both personal experience in my real world business and social circles cross referenced with a liberal interpretation of Groundswell Technographics Profile data. According to Groundswell, only 17% of the 35-44 year old U.S. population are considered Creators. In the social web context - especially if applied to their productive work life - I would argue that becoming a Creator indicates an individual's true adoption of the social web (I accept that this argument is open for debate and am happy to elaborate if people are interested). Even fewer individuals in the 45+ age bracket fall into the Creator adoption category. At best, then, this age bracket of my 35+ year old peers* has just begun to move out of the 15% Innovator and Early Adopter population, which is the percentage of people who need to have adopted a new technology in order for that technology to start to ramp up to general adoption levels (i.e., Early Majority).

In other words, when us old folks buy into it, the social web goes mainstream.